People can be diverted at ANY stage of their route through the criminal justice system.
Diversion is the process to ensure that people with mental health problems who enter (or are at risk of entering) the criminal justice system are identified and provided with appropriate mental health services, treatment and any other support they need.
Using evidence and learning from our work on diversion we have produced the All-Stages Diversion model. It shows the criminal justice pathway and highlights who should be involved, how diversion is achieved and what the outcomes are for each step on the pathway.
We have developed an interactive model which looks at how adults can be diverted.
The PDF below features diversion for adults and young people.
Download the All-Stages Diversion model (154 KB)
In December 2007, Lord Bradley was asked to carry out a review of how more offenders with severe mental health problems can be diverted away from prison and into more appropriate facilities.
The report makes numerous recommendations for improvements in the way people with mental health problems and people with learning disabilities are managed in the criminal justice system. They include a call for Criminal Justice Mental Health teams to divert people in police stations as well as the courts.
We were involved with the Working Group for this review and submitted evidence based on our research projects. We also published a briefing paper on the report and the government's response (see right).
The review fed into the Improving health, supporting justice: the national delivery plan of the Health and Criminal Justice Programme Board. You can read our response to the delivery plan here.
Diversion finds that court diversion and liaison schemes in England only work with one in five of the people with mental health problems who go through the criminal justice system. Many opportunities for diversion are being missed and too little is being done to ensure that offenders with mental health problems make continuing use of community mental health services.
But in the absence of a clear national policy framework, diversion services have developed in a piecemeal and haphazard way. Many schemes are insecurely funded and there is an unacceptably wide degree of variation in their ways of working.
The report looks at the evidence on outcomes and the effectiveness of diversion, it includes information from site visits and looks at whether diversion is good value for money.
Some of the research that went into the report came from international evidence that we gathered at a video conference. World-renowned experts from seven countries discussed issues such as getting support for diversion, the cost benefits, local initiatives, what people might be diverted into and multi-agency working. A summary of the conference is available to download below.
Download Video Conference Summary (44 KB)